Skip to content
NoKYC Score

Bitrefill vs Cryptorefills

Cryptorefills has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 7.1 against 5.0, and Privacy 6.1 against 2.1.

Bitrefill

Largest crypto gift-card, top-up and eSIM store; terms allow KYC requests

Privacy

2.1/ 10

Poor

Safety

5.0/ 10

Caution

ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →

Cryptorefills

Dutch store for gift cards, top-ups, eSIMs and travel paid in crypto, marketed as no-KYC

Privacy

6.1/ 10

Fair

Safety

7.1/ 10

Strong

No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →

Side by side

BitrefillCryptorefills
Category Gift Cards Gift Cards
KYC policy ID on risk flag No ID mentioned
Custody Mixed N/A
Sign-up Email optional Email required
Open source No No
Tor onion address No No
Coins BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, LTC BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, LTC
Pay with Crypto, Lightning Crypto, Lightning
Founded 2014 2018
Jurisdiction Sweden Netherlands
Incidents on record 1 0
Published tests (180 days) 0 0

Only Bitrefill

AML screeningMay request IDClosed sourceRuns an affiliate programme

Both

Accepts LightningLegal entity disclosed5+ years operating

Only Cryptorefills

Requires emailRefund without ID

Where they sit among gift cards

2 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 10 10 PRIVATE AND SAFE SAFE, ASKS MORE PRIVATE, LESS PROVEN PRIVACY GRADE → SAFETY GRADE → Cryptorefills Privacy 6.1 · Safety 7.1 Coincards Privacy 5.9 · Safety 6.5 Coinsbee Privacy 2.3 · Safety 5.8 ProxyStore Digital G Privacy 8.2 · Safety 5.5 UseBitcoin Privacy 6.3 · Safety 5.5 The Bitcoin Company Privacy 5.9 · Safety 5.0 Bitrefill Privacy 2.1 · Safety 5.0 Anon Privacy 5.8 · Safety 4.7
Trade Spend Infrastructure Identity 8 services. Hover or tap a point.

Questions

Is Bitrefill or Cryptorefills safer?

Cryptorefills has the higher Safety grade: Bitrefill 5.0, Cryptorefills 7.1, out of 10.

Does Bitrefill or Cryptorefills require KYC?

Bitrefill is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). Cryptorefills is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).

Which has more incidents on record?

Bitrefill has 1 and Cryptorefills has 0 documented incidents in the registry.

More comparisons