bithost vs SporeStack
SporeStack has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 5.6, and Privacy 8.7 against 6.3.
bithost
Reseller of DigitalOcean, Linode and Vultr servers paid only in crypto
Privacy
6.3/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.6/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| bithost | SporeStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Random account number |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, LTC, XMR, ZEC, USDT, USDC, SOL, DOGE | XMR, BTC, BCH |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | From about $0.015/hour depending on provider; minimum top-up $20 | Not published |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only bithost
Requires emailAnonymous operator
Both
Accepts MoneroNo phone needed5+ years operating
Only SporeStack
No email neededAccount-number loginTor onion serviceRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is bithost or SporeStack safer?
SporeStack has the higher Safety grade: bithost 5.6, SporeStack 6.0, out of 10.
Does bithost or SporeStack require KYC?
bithost is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
bithost has 0 and SporeStack has 0 documented incidents in the registry.