bithost vs HostZealot
It is a trade-off. HostZealot has the higher Safety grade (6.5 against 5.6), while bithost has the higher Privacy grade (6.3 against 5.8).
bithost
Reseller of DigitalOcean, Linode and Vultr servers paid only in crypto
Privacy
6.3/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.6/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
HostZealot
VPS and dedicated host in 25+ locations, paid by card, PayPal, Bitcoin or USDT
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| bithost | HostZealot | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, LTC, XMR, ZEC, USDT, USDC, SOL, DOGE | BTC, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Card, PayPal, Bank transfer |
| Fees | From about $0.015/hour depending on provider; minimum top-up $20 | VPS from EUR 6.49/month when checked |
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Bulgaria |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only bithost
Accepts MoneroNo phone neededAnonymous operator
Both
Requires email5+ years operating
Only HostZealot
Legal entity disclosedRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is bithost or HostZealot safer?
HostZealot has the higher Safety grade: bithost 5.6, HostZealot 6.5, out of 10.
Does bithost or HostZealot require KYC?
bithost is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). HostZealot is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
bithost has 0 and HostZealot has 0 documented incidents in the registry.