AlphaVPS vs BitLaunch
It is a trade-off. AlphaVPS has the higher Safety grade (6.1 against 6.0), while BitLaunch has the higher Privacy grade (5.8 against 2.5).
AlphaVPS
Bulgarian VPS and dedicated host since 2013 that takes crypto but rejects anonymous orders
Privacy
2.5/ 10
Poor
Safety
6.1/ 10
Fair
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
BitLaunch
Crypto-billed reseller of DigitalOcean, Vultr and Linode cloud servers
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AlphaVPS | BitLaunch | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | BTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card, PayPal | Crypto |
| Fees | VPS from EUR 1.67/month (storage) or EUR 2.54/month when checked | Not published |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
| Jurisdiction | Bulgaria | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AlphaVPS
May request IDLegal entity disclosedRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Requires email5+ years operating
Only BitLaunch
Nothing distinct
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is AlphaVPS or BitLaunch safer?
AlphaVPS has the higher Safety grade: AlphaVPS 6.1, BitLaunch 6.0, out of 10.
Does AlphaVPS or BitLaunch require KYC?
AlphaVPS is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). BitLaunch is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
AlphaVPS has 0 and BitLaunch has 0 documented incidents in the registry.