SporeStack vs VDSok
SporeStack has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 4.6, and Privacy 8.7 against 5.8.
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
VDSok
Low-cost VDS host with servers in Moscow, Amsterdam and Frankfurt
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
4.6/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| SporeStack | VDSok | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Random account number | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | XMR, BTC, BCH | USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto |
| Fees | Not published | VDS from $1.54/month per the homepage; Russia Ryzen plans listed from $5.05/month when checked |
| Limits | Not published | Refunds only for faults on the provider's side, requested within 72 hours |
| Founded | 2017 | 2025 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Russia |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only SporeStack
No email neededNo phone neededAccount-number loginTor onion serviceAccepts Monero5+ years operatingRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Nothing distinct
Only VDSok
Requires emailAnonymous operator
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is SporeStack or VDSok safer?
SporeStack has the higher Safety grade: SporeStack 6.0, VDSok 4.6, out of 10.
Does SporeStack or VDSok require KYC?
SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required). VDSok is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
SporeStack has 0 and VDSok has 0 documented incidents in the registry.