Heleket vs SHKeeper
SHKeeper has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 7.3 against 3.1, and Privacy 8.8 against 1.7.
Heleket
Custodial crypto payment processing for websites and Telegram bots, fees from 0.4%
Privacy
1.7/ 10
Poor
Safety
3.1/ 10
Poor
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
SHKeeper
Self-hosted open-source crypto payment gateway with no transaction fees
Privacy
8.8/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.3/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Heleket | SHKeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payment Gateways | Payment Gateways |
| KYC policy | ID on risk flag | ID never required |
| Custody | Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | Not published | No account needed |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, USDT | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, TRX |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto |
| Fees | From 0.4% per payment, no connection fee | No payment fee |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Decentralised / none |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Heleket
CustodialClosed sourceMay request IDAML screeningAnonymous operator
Both
Nothing distinct
Only SHKeeper
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededOpen sourceNon-custodialSelf-hostable
Where they sit among payment gateways
Questions
Is Heleket or SHKeeper safer?
SHKeeper has the higher Safety grade: Heleket 3.1, SHKeeper 7.3, out of 10.
Does Heleket or SHKeeper require KYC?
Heleket is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag). SHKeeper is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
Heleket has 0 and SHKeeper has 0 documented incidents in the registry.