Cockbox vs SporeStack
SporeStack has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 4.6, and Privacy 8.7 against 6.6.
Cockbox
Tor-friendly VPS provider billing in Bitcoin or Monero
Privacy
6.6/ 10
Fair
Safety
4.6/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
SporeStack
API-driven VPS hosting with token accounts; no email and no KYC
Privacy
8.7/ 10
Excellent
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Cockbox | SporeStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | VPS | VPS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email optional | Random account number |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Coins | BTC, XMR | XMR, BTC, BCH |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | From $15/month (2 GB) when checked | Not published |
| Founded | Not published | 2017 |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Cockbox
Anonymous operator
Both
Accepts MoneroRuns an affiliate programme
Only SporeStack
No email neededNo phone neededAccount-number loginTor onion service5+ years operating
Where they sit among vps
Questions
Is Cockbox or SporeStack safer?
SporeStack has the higher Safety grade: Cockbox 4.6, SporeStack 6.0, out of 10.
Does Cockbox or SporeStack require KYC?
Cockbox is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). SporeStack is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
Cockbox has 0 and SporeStack has 0 documented incidents in the registry.