spamgourmet vs TrashMail
TrashMail has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.5 against 6.4, and Privacy 6.3 against 6.0.
spamgourmet
Free non-commercial disposable forwarding addresses running since 2000
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.4/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
TrashMail
German disposable-address service with a free tier and cheap Plus plan
Privacy
6.3/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| spamgourmet | TrashMail | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Email Aliases | Email Aliases |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email optional |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Pay with | Not published | Card |
| Fees | Free | Free up to 25 addresses; Plus €1.99/month or €18.49/year |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Germany |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only spamgourmet
Requires emailOpen sourceAnonymous operator
Both
5+ years operating
Only TrashMail
Legal entity disclosedNo phone needed
Where they sit among email aliases
Questions
Is spamgourmet or TrashMail safer?
TrashMail has the higher Safety grade: spamgourmet 6.4, TrashMail 6.5, out of 10.
Does spamgourmet or TrashMail require KYC?
spamgourmet is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). TrashMail is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
spamgourmet has 0 and TrashMail has 0 documented incidents in the registry.