AliasVault vs spamgourmet
It is a trade-off. spamgourmet has the higher Safety grade (6.4 against 6.1), while AliasVault has the higher Privacy grade (6.7 against 6.0).
AliasVault
Open-source password and email alias manager with a built-in mail server
Privacy
6.7/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.1/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
spamgourmet
Free non-commercial disposable forwarding addresses running since 2000
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.4/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AliasVault | spamgourmet | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Email Aliases | Email Aliases |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email optional | Email required |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Fees | Free vault on the official cloud service | Free |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AliasVault
Self-hostable
Both
Open source
Only spamgourmet
Requires email5+ years operatingAnonymous operator
Where they sit among email aliases
Questions
Is AliasVault or spamgourmet safer?
spamgourmet has the higher Safety grade: AliasVault 6.1, spamgourmet 6.4, out of 10.
Does AliasVault or spamgourmet require KYC?
AliasVault is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). spamgourmet is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
AliasVault has 0 and spamgourmet has 0 documented incidents in the registry.