SimpleLogin vs spamgourmet
SimpleLogin has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.6 against 6.4, and Privacy 6.7 against 6.0.
SimpleLogin
Open-source email alias service owned by Proton; self-hostable, crypto via reseller
Privacy
6.7/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.6/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
spamgourmet
Free non-commercial disposable forwarding addresses running since 2000
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.4/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| SimpleLogin | spamgourmet | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Email Aliases | Email Aliases |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR | Not published |
| Pay with | Card, Crypto, Monero | Not published |
| Fees | Free plan with 10 aliases; Premium $36/year or $4/month | Free |
| Jurisdiction | Switzerland | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only SimpleLogin
Accepts MoneroSelf-hostableLegal entity disclosed
Both
Open sourceRequires email
Only spamgourmet
5+ years operatingAnonymous operator
Where they sit among email aliases
Questions
Is SimpleLogin or spamgourmet safer?
SimpleLogin has the higher Safety grade: SimpleLogin 6.6, spamgourmet 6.4, out of 10.
Does SimpleLogin or spamgourmet require KYC?
SimpleLogin is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). spamgourmet is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
SimpleLogin has 0 and spamgourmet has 0 documented incidents in the registry.