Forward Email vs spamgourmet
They are level on Privacy. spamgourmet has the higher Safety grade, 6.4 against 6.3.
Forward Email
Open-source email forwarding and hosting that processes forwarded mail in memory
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.3/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
spamgourmet
Free non-commercial disposable forwarding addresses running since 2000
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.4/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Forward Email | spamgourmet | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Email Aliases | Email Aliases |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Pay with | Card, PayPal, Crypto | Not published |
| Fees | Not published | Free |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Forward Email
Legal entity disclosed
Both
Open sourceRequires email
Only spamgourmet
5+ years operatingAnonymous operator
Where they sit among email aliases
Questions
Is Forward Email or spamgourmet safer?
spamgourmet has the higher Safety grade: Forward Email 6.3, spamgourmet 6.4, out of 10.
Does Forward Email or spamgourmet require KYC?
Forward Email is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). spamgourmet is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Forward Email has 0 and spamgourmet has 0 documented incidents in the registry.