SOAX vs Thunderproxy
Thunderproxy has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.5 against 5.1, and Privacy 5.8 against 0.7.
SOAX
UK proxy network that requires identity verification before any paid service
Privacy
0.7/ 10
Poor
Safety
5.1/ 10
Caution
ID mandatory KYC 4 Docs reviewed Full review →
Thunderproxy
Residential, static ISP and datacenter proxies with card or crypto checkout
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| SOAX | Thunderproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Proxies | Proxies |
| KYC policy | ID mandatory | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, SOL | Not published |
| Pay with | Card, Crypto, Bank transfer | Card, Crypto |
| Fees | Not published | Residential from $1.72/GB; static ISP from $1.79/IP; datacenter from $0.75/GB |
| Limits | Not published | All payments non-refundable; free trials issued manually |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom | Lithuania |
| Not available in | Not published | Russia |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only SOAX
May request ID
Both
Requires emailLegal entity disclosed
Only Thunderproxy
Nothing distinct
Where they sit among proxies
Questions
Is SOAX or Thunderproxy safer?
Thunderproxy has the higher Safety grade: SOAX 5.1, Thunderproxy 5.5, out of 10.
Does SOAX or Thunderproxy require KYC?
SOAX is KYC level 4 (ID mandatory). Thunderproxy is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
SOAX has 0 and Thunderproxy has 0 documented incidents in the registry.