Geonode vs SOAX
Geonode has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.6 against 5.1, and Privacy 6.0 against 0.7.
Geonode
Singapore-based proxy and web-scraping provider; accepts crypto, cards and wire
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.6/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
SOAX
UK proxy network that requires identity verification before any paid service
Privacy
0.7/ 10
Poor
Safety
5.1/ 10
Caution
ID mandatory KYC 4 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Geonode | SOAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Proxies | Proxies |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID mandatory |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | Not published | BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, SOL |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card, Bank transfer | Card, Crypto, Bank transfer |
| Fees | Residential from $0.27/GB; ISP from $1.25/IP; datacenter from $0.14/GB | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | Singapore | United Kingdom |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Geonode
Refund without IDRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Requires email
Only SOAX
May request IDLegal entity disclosed
Where they sit among proxies
Questions
Is Geonode or SOAX safer?
Geonode has the higher Safety grade: Geonode 5.6, SOAX 5.1, out of 10.
Does Geonode or SOAX require KYC?
Geonode is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). SOAX is KYC level 4 (ID mandatory).
Which has more incidents on record?
Geonode has 0 and SOAX has 0 documented incidents in the registry.