Quackr vs Veritel
Veritel has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.5 against 5.2, and Privacy 6.2 against 5.1.
Quackr
Free shared temporary numbers and paid private non-VoIP number rentals
Privacy
5.1/ 10
Caution
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Veritel
Temporary numbers on physical SIM cards for one-time SMS verification
Privacy
6.2/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.5/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Quackr | Veritel | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Phone Numbers & SMS | Phone Numbers & SMS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Pay with | Card, PayPal, Crypto | Card, Crypto |
| Fees | Public numbers free; private number pricing not confirmed during this review | Pay-as-you-go; price depends on country and target service |
| Limits | Not published | Each number usable for up to 15 minutes per session |
| Founded | 2020 | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Quackr
Requires emailAML screening
Both
Legal entity disclosed
Only Veritel
Nothing distinct
Where they sit among phone numbers & sms
Questions
Is Quackr or Veritel safer?
Veritel has the higher Safety grade: Quackr 5.2, Veritel 5.5, out of 10.
Does Quackr or Veritel require KYC?
Quackr is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). Veritel is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Quackr has 0 and Veritel has 0 documented incidents in the registry.