JMP vs Quackr
JMP has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.8 against 5.2, and Privacy 6.7 against 5.1.
JMP
US and Canadian phone numbers delivered over XMPP, built on open-source software
Privacy
6.7/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.8/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Quackr
Free shared temporary numbers and paid private non-VoIP number rentals
Privacy
5.1/ 10
Caution
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| JMP | Quackr | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Phone Numbers & SMS | Phone Numbers & SMS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | Email required |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC | Not published |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card | Card, PayPal, Crypto |
| Fees | $4.99 per month | Public numbers free; private number pricing not confirmed during this review |
| Founded | Not published | 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Hong Kong |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only JMP
No email neededOpen source
Both
Nothing distinct
Only Quackr
Requires emailAML screeningLegal entity disclosed
Where they sit among phone numbers & sms
Questions
Is JMP or Quackr safer?
JMP has the higher Safety grade: JMP 5.8, Quackr 5.2, out of 10.
Does JMP or Quackr require KYC?
JMP is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). Quackr is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
JMP has 0 and Quackr has 0 documented incidents in the registry.