Anosim vs JMP
JMP has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.8 against 5.1, and Privacy 6.7 against 4.3.
Anosim
SMS activations and number rentals for 900+ sites, paid by crypto or card
Privacy
4.3/ 10
Caution
Safety
5.1/ 10
Caution
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
JMP
US and Canadian phone numbers delivered over XMPP, built on open-source software
Privacy
6.7/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.8/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Anosim | JMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Phone Numbers & SMS | Phone Numbers & SMS |
| KYC policy | ID in rare cases | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | No account needed |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | Not published | BTC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card | Crypto, Card |
| Fees | Not published | $4.99 per month |
| Jurisdiction | United Arab Emirates | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Anosim
Requires emailMay request IDLegal entity disclosed
Both
Nothing distinct
Only JMP
No email neededOpen source
Where they sit among phone numbers & sms
Questions
Is Anosim or JMP safer?
JMP has the higher Safety grade: Anosim 5.1, JMP 5.8, out of 10.
Does Anosim or JMP require KYC?
Anosim is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases). JMP is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Anosim has 0 and JMP has 0 documented incidents in the registry.