Crypton.sh vs SMSPool
Crypton.sh has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.0 against 4.7, and Privacy 7.7 against 5.8.
Crypton.sh
Cloud-hosted physical SIM numbers, travel eSIMs and SMS with no name or email
Privacy
7.7/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
SMSPool
SMS verification numbers; stopped taking Monero directly in July 2026
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
4.7/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Crypton.sh | SMSPool | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Phone Numbers & SMS | Phone Numbers & SMS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Card |
| Fees | Number rentals about €14–28/month by country when checked | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 1 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Crypton.sh
No email neededTor onion serviceRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Nothing distinct
Only SMSPool
Requires email
Where they sit among phone numbers & sms
Questions
Is Crypton.sh or SMSPool safer?
Crypton.sh has the higher Safety grade: Crypton.sh 5.0, SMSPool 4.7, out of 10.
Does Crypton.sh or SMSPool require KYC?
Crypton.sh is KYC level 0 (ID never required). SMSPool is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Crypton.sh has 0 and SMSPool has 1 documented incident in the registry.