Crypton.sh vs JMP
It is a trade-off. JMP has the higher Safety grade (5.8 against 5.0), while Crypton.sh has the higher Privacy grade (7.7 against 6.7).
Crypton.sh
Cloud-hosted physical SIM numbers, travel eSIMs and SMS with no name or email
Privacy
7.7/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
JMP
US and Canadian phone numbers delivered over XMPP, built on open-source software
Privacy
6.7/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.8/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Crypton.sh | JMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Phone Numbers & SMS | Phone Numbers & SMS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | Not published | BTC |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Card |
| Fees | Number rentals about €14–28/month by country when checked | $4.99 per month |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Crypton.sh
Tor onion serviceRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No email needed
Only JMP
Open source
Where they sit among phone numbers & sms
Questions
Is Crypton.sh or JMP safer?
JMP has the higher Safety grade: Crypton.sh 5.0, JMP 5.8, out of 10.
Does Crypton.sh or JMP require KYC?
Crypton.sh is KYC level 0 (ID never required). JMP is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Crypton.sh has 0 and JMP has 0 documented incidents in the registry.