Crypton.sh vs Skytelecom
Crypton.sh has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.0 against 4.6, and Privacy 7.7 against 6.6.
Crypton.sh
Cloud-hosted physical SIM numbers, travel eSIMs and SMS with no name or email
Privacy
7.7/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Skytelecom
Pay-as-you-go SMS, VoIP calling and SIP trunking with card or crypto top-ups
Privacy
6.6/ 10
Fair
Safety
4.6/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Crypton.sh | Skytelecom | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Phone Numbers & SMS | Phone Numbers & SMS |
| KYC policy | ID never required | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | Yes |
| Coins | Not published | BTC, LTC, ETH, USDT, XMR |
| Pay with | Crypto | Crypto, Monero, Card |
| Fees | Number rentals about €14–28/month by country when checked | Pay-as-you-go per-destination voice and SMS rates in EUR |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Crypton.sh
No email neededRuns an affiliate programme
Both
Tor onion service
Only Skytelecom
Accepts MoneroRequires emailAnonymous operator
Where they sit among phone numbers & sms
Questions
Is Crypton.sh or Skytelecom safer?
Crypton.sh has the higher Safety grade: Crypton.sh 5.0, Skytelecom 4.6, out of 10.
Does Crypton.sh or Skytelecom require KYC?
Crypton.sh is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Skytelecom is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Crypton.sh has 0 and Skytelecom has 0 documented incidents in the registry.