Coinos vs SHKeeper
SHKeeper has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 7.3 against 4.5, and Privacy 8.8 against 6.4.
Coinos
Custodial web wallet and payment page for Bitcoin, Lightning and Liquid
Privacy
6.4/ 10
Fair
Safety
4.5/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
SHKeeper
Self-hosted open-source crypto payment gateway with no transaction fees
Privacy
8.8/ 10
Excellent
Safety
7.3/ 10
Strong
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Coinos | SHKeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Payment Gateways | Payment Gateways |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID never required |
| Custody | Custodial | Non Custodial |
| Sign-up | Email optional | No account needed |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, L-BTC | BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, TRX |
| Pay with | Crypto, Lightning | Crypto |
| Fees | Receiving and internal transfers free; cross-network withdrawals 0.4% (Bitcoin) or 0.1% (Lightning or Liquid) | No payment fee |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Decentralised / none |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Coinos
Accepts LightningCustodial
Both
No email neededNo phone needed
Only SHKeeper
No registrationOpen sourceNon-custodialSelf-hostable
Where they sit among payment gateways
Questions
Is Coinos or SHKeeper safer?
SHKeeper has the higher Safety grade: Coinos 4.5, SHKeeper 7.3, out of 10.
Does Coinos or SHKeeper require KYC?
Coinos is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). SHKeeper is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
Coinos has 0 and SHKeeper has 0 documented incidents in the registry.