Anosim vs Crypton.sh
It is a trade-off. Anosim has the higher Safety grade (5.1 against 5.0), while Crypton.sh has the higher Privacy grade (7.7 against 4.3).
Anosim
SMS activations and number rentals for 900+ sites, paid by crypto or card
Privacy
4.3/ 10
Caution
Safety
5.1/ 10
Caution
ID in rare cases KYC 2 Docs reviewed Full review →
Crypton.sh
Cloud-hosted physical SIM numbers, travel eSIMs and SMS with no name or email
Privacy
7.7/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Anosim | Crypton.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Phone Numbers & SMS | Phone Numbers & SMS |
| KYC policy | ID in rare cases | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Pay with | Crypto, Card | Crypto |
| Fees | Not published | Number rentals about €14–28/month by country when checked |
| Jurisdiction | United Arab Emirates | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Anosim
Requires emailMay request IDLegal entity disclosed
Both
Nothing distinct
Only Crypton.sh
No email neededTor onion serviceRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among phone numbers & sms
Questions
Is Anosim or Crypton.sh safer?
Anosim has the higher Safety grade: Anosim 5.1, Crypton.sh 5.0, out of 10.
Does Anosim or Crypton.sh require KYC?
Anosim is KYC level 2 (ID in rare cases). Crypton.sh is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
Anosim has 0 and Crypton.sh has 0 documented incidents in the registry.