nadanada (formerly LNVPN) vs Silent.link
nadanada (formerly LNVPN) has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.0 against 4.6, and Privacy 9.1 against 8.5.
nadanada (formerly LNVPN)
Account-free eSIM data, VPN access and disposable numbers paid in crypto
Privacy
9.1/ 10
Excellent
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Silent.link
Global pay-as-you-go eSIM with no KYC and no email, paid in crypto
Privacy
8.5/ 10
Excellent
Safety
4.6/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| nadanada (formerly LNVPN) | Silent.link | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | eSIM & Mobile Data | eSIM & Mobile Data |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ZEC, ETH, USDT, USDC | BTC, XMR, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Lightning, Card | Crypto, Monero, Lightning |
| Fees | eSIM from $0.99; VPN from $0.50 | Data from $0.83/GB in Europe and $1.60/GB in the USA, per the site |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only nadanada (formerly LNVPN)
Tor onion serviceNo-logs policyRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroAccepts Lightning
Only Silent.link
Anonymous operator
Where they sit among esim & mobile data
Questions
Is nadanada (formerly LNVPN) or Silent.link safer?
nadanada (formerly LNVPN) has the higher Safety grade: nadanada (formerly LNVPN) 5.0, Silent.link 4.6, out of 10.
Does nadanada (formerly LNVPN) or Silent.link require KYC?
nadanada (formerly LNVPN) is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Silent.link is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
nadanada (formerly LNVPN) has 0 and Silent.link has 0 documented incidents in the registry.