nadanada (formerly LNVPN) vs PikaSim
They are level on Safety. nadanada (formerly LNVPN) has the higher Privacy grade, 9.1 against 8.5.
nadanada (formerly LNVPN)
Account-free eSIM data, VPN access and disposable numbers paid in crypto
Privacy
9.1/ 10
Excellent
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
PikaSim
Travel eSIMs sold without sign-up or email; card or crypto payment
Privacy
8.5/ 10
Excellent
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| nadanada (formerly LNVPN) | PikaSim | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | eSIM & Mobile Data | eSIM & Mobile Data |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | Yes | No |
| Coins | BTC, XMR, ZEC, ETH, USDT, USDC | BTC, XMR, ZEC, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, Lightning, Card | Crypto, Monero, Lightning, Card |
| Fees | eSIM from $0.99; VPN from $0.50 | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only nadanada (formerly LNVPN)
Tor onion serviceNo-logs policyRuns an affiliate programme
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroAccepts Lightning
Only PikaSim
Nothing distinct
Where they sit among esim & mobile data
Questions
Is nadanada (formerly LNVPN) or PikaSim safer?
They have the same Safety grade, 5.0 out of 10.
Does nadanada (formerly LNVPN) or PikaSim require KYC?
nadanada (formerly LNVPN) is KYC level 0 (ID never required). PikaSim is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
nadanada (formerly LNVPN) has 0 and PikaSim has 0 documented incidents in the registry.