AnonymSMS vs Crypton.sh
They are level on Safety. Crypton.sh has the higher Privacy grade, 7.7 against 6.8.
AnonymSMS
Free public numbers for receiving SMS online, plus private number rentals
Privacy
6.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Crypton.sh
Cloud-hosted physical SIM numbers, travel eSIMs and SMS with no name or email
Privacy
7.7/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AnonymSMS | Crypton.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Phone Numbers & SMS | Phone Numbers & SMS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Pay with | Card, PayPal, Crypto | Crypto |
| Fees | Public numbers free; private rentals priced per country and duration | Number rentals about €14–28/month by country when checked |
| Limits | Messages to public numbers are visible to everyone | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | United States | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AnonymSMS
No registration
Both
Nothing distinct
Only Crypton.sh
No email neededTor onion serviceRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among phone numbers & sms
Questions
Is AnonymSMS or Crypton.sh safer?
They have the same Safety grade, 5.0 out of 10.
Does AnonymSMS or Crypton.sh require KYC?
AnonymSMS is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). Crypton.sh is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
AnonymSMS has 0 and Crypton.sh has 0 documented incidents in the registry.