AliasVault vs SimpleLogin
They are level on Privacy. SimpleLogin has the higher Safety grade, 6.6 against 6.1.
AliasVault
Open-source password and email alias manager with a built-in mail server
Privacy
6.7/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.1/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
SimpleLogin
Open-source email alias service owned by Proton; self-hostable, crypto via reseller
Privacy
6.7/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.6/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| AliasVault | SimpleLogin | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Email Aliases | Email Aliases |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email optional | Email required |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | Not published | BTC, XMR |
| Pay with | Not published | Card, Crypto, Monero |
| Fees | Free vault on the official cloud service | Free plan with 10 aliases; Premium $36/year or $4/month |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | Switzerland |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only AliasVault
Nothing distinct
Both
Open sourceSelf-hostable
Only SimpleLogin
Accepts MoneroLegal entity disclosedRequires email
Where they sit among email aliases
Questions
Is AliasVault or SimpleLogin safer?
SimpleLogin has the higher Safety grade: AliasVault 6.1, SimpleLogin 6.6, out of 10.
Does AliasVault or SimpleLogin require KYC?
AliasVault is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). SimpleLogin is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
AliasVault has 0 and SimpleLogin has 0 documented incidents in the registry.