5SIM vs Crypton.sh
They are level on Safety. Crypton.sh has the higher Privacy grade, 7.7 against 5.8.
5SIM
Low-cost virtual numbers for one-off SMS verification
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Crypton.sh
Cloud-hosted physical SIM numbers, travel eSIMs and SMS with no name or email
Privacy
7.7/ 10
Strong
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| 5SIM | Crypton.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Phone Numbers & SMS | Phone Numbers & SMS |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | Yes |
| Pay with | Not published | Crypto |
| Fees | Numbers advertised from $0.008 each | Number rentals about €14–28/month by country when checked |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only 5SIM
Requires email
Both
Nothing distinct
Only Crypton.sh
No email neededTor onion serviceRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among phone numbers & sms
Questions
Is 5SIM or Crypton.sh safer?
They have the same Safety grade, 5.0 out of 10.
Does 5SIM or Crypton.sh require KYC?
5SIM is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). Crypton.sh is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
5SIM has 0 and Crypton.sh has 0 documented incidents in the registry.