Cypher eSIM vs Silent.link
Cypher eSIM has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 5.2 against 4.6, and Privacy 8.8 against 8.5.
Cypher eSIM
Crypto-only travel eSIM for 180+ countries with no account, email or KYC
Privacy
8.8/ 10
Excellent
Safety
5.2/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Silent.link
Global pay-as-you-go eSIM with no KYC and no email, paid in crypto
Privacy
8.5/ 10
Excellent
Safety
4.6/ 10
Caution
ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Cypher eSIM | Silent.link | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | eSIM & Mobile Data | eSIM & Mobile Data |
| KYC policy | ID never required | ID never required |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | No account needed | No account needed |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | USDT, USDC, DAI, BTC, ETH, SOL, XMR, TON | BTC, XMR, USDT |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero | Crypto, Monero, Lightning |
| Fees | Plans from $1, per the site | Data from $0.83/GB in Europe and $1.60/GB in the USA, per the site |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Cypher eSIM
No-logs policyRefund without ID
Both
No registrationNo email neededNo phone neededAccepts MoneroAnonymous operator
Only Silent.link
Accepts Lightning
Where they sit among esim & mobile data
Questions
Is Cypher eSIM or Silent.link safer?
Cypher eSIM has the higher Safety grade: Cypher eSIM 5.2, Silent.link 4.6, out of 10.
Does Cypher eSIM or Silent.link require KYC?
Cypher eSIM is KYC level 0 (ID never required). Silent.link is KYC level 0 (ID never required).
Which has more incidents on record?
Cypher eSIM has 0 and Silent.link has 0 documented incidents in the registry.