Njalla vs Porkbun
Njalla has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.0 against 5.1, and Privacy 6.3 against 1.5.
Njalla
Privacy-oriented domain service that also sells VPS and VPN, payable in crypto
Privacy
6.3/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.0/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Porkbun
US registrar with free WHOIS privacy that takes USDC through Coinbase, but may ask for government ID
Privacy
1.5/ 10
Poor
Safety
5.1/ 10
Caution
ID on risk flag KYC 3 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Njalla | Porkbun | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Domains | Domains |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | ID on risk flag |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | No |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Coins | BTC, LTC, XMR, ETH | USDC |
| Pay with | Crypto, Monero, PayPal | Crypto, Card, PayPal, Bank transfer |
| Fees | Domains from €15/year depending on the top-level domain | No extra fee for crypto payments, per its crypto page |
| Founded | 2017 | Not published |
| Jurisdiction | Not published | United States |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Njalla
No phone neededAccepts Monero5+ years operating
Both
Requires email
Only Porkbun
Legal entity disclosedRequires phone numberMay request IDRuns an affiliate programme
Where they sit among domains
Questions
Is Njalla or Porkbun safer?
Njalla has the higher Safety grade: Njalla 6.0, Porkbun 5.1, out of 10.
Does Njalla or Porkbun require KYC?
Njalla is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). Porkbun is KYC level 3 (ID on risk flag).
Which has more incidents on record?
Njalla has 0 and Porkbun has 0 documented incidents in the registry.