Firefox Relay vs spamgourmet
They are level on Privacy. spamgourmet has the higher Safety grade, 6.4 against 5.8.
Firefox Relay
Mozilla's email-masking service; requires an account with a verified email
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.8/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
spamgourmet
Free non-commercial disposable forwarding addresses running since 2000
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.4/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Firefox Relay | spamgourmet | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Email Aliases | Email Aliases |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Fees | Free tier; paid Relay Premium tier | Free |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Firefox Relay
Nothing distinct
Both
Open sourceRequires email
Only spamgourmet
5+ years operatingAnonymous operator
Where they sit among email aliases
Questions
Is Firefox Relay or spamgourmet safer?
spamgourmet has the higher Safety grade: Firefox Relay 5.8, spamgourmet 6.4, out of 10.
Does Firefox Relay or spamgourmet require KYC?
Firefox Relay is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). spamgourmet is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Firefox Relay has 0 and spamgourmet has 0 documented incidents in the registry.