Skip to content
NoKYCScore
/
Submit a service

Crypton.sh vs SMS4Sats

It is a trade-off. Crypton.sh has the higher Safety grade (5.0 against 4.6), while SMS4Sats has the higher Privacy grade (8.5 against 7.7).

Crypton.sh

Cloud-hosted physical SIM numbers, travel eSIMs and SMS with no name or email

Privacy

7.7/ 10

Strong

Safety

5.0/ 10

Caution

ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →

SMS4Sats

Receive SMS verification codes by paying a Lightning invoice, no account

Privacy

8.5/ 10

Excellent

Safety

4.6/ 10

Caution

ID never required KYC 0 Docs reviewed Full review →

Side by side

Crypton.shSMS4Sats
Category Phone Numbers & SMS Phone Numbers & SMS
KYC policy ID never required ID never required
Custody N/A N/A
Sign-up No account needed No account needed
Open source No No
Tor onion address Yes Yes
Coins Not published BTC
Pay with Crypto Lightning
Fees Number rentals about €14–28/month by country when checked Not published
Incidents on record 0 0
Published tests (180 days) 0 0

Only Crypton.sh

Runs an affiliate programme

Both

No email neededTor onion service

Only SMS4Sats

No registrationNo phone neededAccepts LightningAnonymous operator

Where they sit among phone numbers & sms

2 2 4 4 6 6 8 8 10 10 PRIVATE AND SAFE SAFE, ASKS MORE PRIVATE, LESS PROVEN PRIVACY GRADE → SAFETY GRADE → TextVerified Privacy 6.0 · Safety 6.6 JMP Privacy 6.7 · Safety 5.8 Veritel Privacy 6.2 · Safety 5.5 Quackr Privacy 5.1 · Safety 5.2 Narayana Privacy 5.9 · Safety 5.1 Anosim Privacy 4.3 · Safety 5.1 Crypton.sh Privacy 7.7 · Safety 5.0 AnonymSMS Privacy 6.8 · Safety 5.0 5SIM Privacy 5.8 · Safety 5.0 SMSPool Privacy 5.8 · Safety 4.7 SMS4Sats Privacy 8.5 · Safety 4.6 MoneroSMS Privacy 7.0 · Safety 4.6 Skytelecom Privacy 6.6 · Safety 4.6 JuicySMS Privacy 6.2 · Safety 4.6 VirtualSMS Privacy 5.9 · Safety 4.6 MrSMS Privacy 5.8 · Safety 4.6 Fetch SMS Privacy 5.1 · Safety 4.3
Trade Spend Infrastructure Identity 17 services. Hover or tap a point.

Questions

Is Crypton.sh or SMS4Sats safer?

Crypton.sh has the higher Safety grade: Crypton.sh 5.0, SMS4Sats 4.6, out of 10.

Does Crypton.sh or SMS4Sats require KYC?

Crypton.sh is KYC level 0 (ID never required). SMS4Sats is KYC level 0 (ID never required).

Which has more incidents on record?

Crypton.sh has 0 and SMS4Sats has 0 documented incidents in the registry.

More comparisons