Burner Mail vs spamgourmet
spamgourmet has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.4 against 5.0, and Privacy 6.0 against 5.8.
Burner Mail
Romanian browser-extension alias service forwarding to your real inbox
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
5.0/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
spamgourmet
Free non-commercial disposable forwarding addresses running since 2000
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.4/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| Burner Mail | spamgourmet | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Email Aliases | Email Aliases |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Fees | Not published | Free |
| Jurisdiction | Romania | Not published |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only Burner Mail
Nothing distinct
Both
Requires email
Only spamgourmet
Open source5+ years operatingAnonymous operator
Where they sit among email aliases
Questions
Is Burner Mail or spamgourmet safer?
spamgourmet has the higher Safety grade: Burner Mail 5.0, spamgourmet 6.4, out of 10.
Does Burner Mail or spamgourmet require KYC?
Burner Mail is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). spamgourmet is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
Burner Mail has 0 and spamgourmet has 0 documented incidents in the registry.