33mail vs spamgourmet
spamgourmet has the higher grade on both axes: Safety 6.4 against 4.6, and Privacy 6.0 against 5.8.
33mail
Alias forwarding on your own 33mail subdomain, free with paid tiers
Privacy
5.8/ 10
Fair
Safety
4.6/ 10
Caution
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
spamgourmet
Free non-commercial disposable forwarding addresses running since 2000
Privacy
6.0/ 10
Fair
Safety
6.4/ 10
Fair
No ID mentioned KYC 1 Docs reviewed Full review →
Side by side
| 33mail | spamgourmet | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Email Aliases | Email Aliases |
| KYC policy | No ID mentioned | No ID mentioned |
| Custody | N/A | N/A |
| Sign-up | Email required | Email required |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Tor onion address | No | No |
| Fees | Free Lite tier; Premium $1/month, Pro $5/month | Free |
| Incidents on record | 0 | 0 |
| Published tests (180 days) | 0 | 0 |
Only 33mail
Nothing distinct
Both
Requires emailAnonymous operator
Only spamgourmet
Open source5+ years operating
Where they sit among email aliases
Questions
Is 33mail or spamgourmet safer?
spamgourmet has the higher Safety grade: 33mail 4.6, spamgourmet 6.4, out of 10.
Does 33mail or spamgourmet require KYC?
33mail is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned). spamgourmet is KYC level 1 (no ID mentioned).
Which has more incidents on record?
33mail has 0 and spamgourmet has 0 documented incidents in the registry.